发布新话题与讨论建议及审查说明
欢迎发布有讨论和阅读价值的话题;不欢迎嘲弄宗教、种族、地缘、性取向等话题。
推崇布拉格公民论坛《对话守则》:对话的目的是寻求真理,不是为了斗争;不做人身攻击;保持主题;辩论时要用证据;要分清对话与只准自己讲话的区别;尽量理解对方。
遵循《世界人权宣言》第十九条不对用户已发表言论进行删除处理;用户有权限删除本人已发表言论;编辑会合并重复话题。
发新话题
收藏 订阅 推荐 打印

goodbye,《economist》

goodbye,《economist》

China's National Day
Party like it's '49
Oct 1st 2009 | BEIJING
From The Economist print edition
............
“It was Mr Hu’s first military parade in Beijing as commander-in-chief and his last before he steps down as
party leader in 2012 and as president in 2013. Marchers displayed some of his favourite slogans, such as
his pledge to build a “harmonious society”. With Beijing full of security personnel, few would have been
convinced that he has made much progress.”

恭喜《economist》又向GFW迈进了一步!

[ 本帖最后由 elfix 于 2009-10-5 18:02 编辑 ]
Anything wrong?
不过是提了下北京应对月饼的紧张态势,应该没事吧
没啥啊, 这样的评论比比皆是
第几期的ECO?
哈哈 我去瞅瞅去
这个不过分,应该有不少外媒这样说吧
哪句话引得楼主不爽了?
With Beijing full of security personnel, few would have been convinced that he has made much progress.”
要是楼主因为这句话觉得要对经济学家说再见的话
我估计楼主打算从更浅显的英文开始阅读
楼主太过敏了吧
一看标题我还以为是反对economist要收费阅读全文了呢……
LZ,实在不行,google全文翻译也可以的……
引用:
原帖由 雷曼兄弟 于 2009-10-7 09:14 发表
With Beijing full of security personnel, few would have been convinced that he has made much progress.”
要是楼主因为这句话觉得要对经济学家说再见的话
我估计楼主打算从更浅显的英文开始阅读
我靠,至于这么冷嘲热讽的吗。
我就是这么低级。至于吗。
发新话题

快速回复主题

 

[完成后可按 Ctrl+Enter 发布]  预览话题  恢复数据  清空内容

顾问:莫之许、北风、不锈钢老鼠、温克坚、艾未未、冉云飞、安替、崔卫平、闾丘露薇、章立凡 形象代言:宋石男 法律顾问:浦志强
编辑
:张书记、上肛上腺、抑扬、musicool、王祖贤、alix001、核子力量、四夕亚日、炽鸢侯、木火
技术:库存袈裟、麦圆、散光